Ambry Genetics
Published on Ambry Genetics (http://ambrygen.com)

Home > Clinical Diagnostics > Tests > Hereditary Cancer Panels > CancerNext

CancerNext

CancerNextTM is a next generation (next-gen) sequencing panel that simultaneously analyzes 24 genes that contribute to increased risk for breast, colon, ovarian, uterine and other cancers.

Please note, all samples received starting June 13, 2013 for BreastNext, CancerNext and OvaNext will automatically include BRCA1/2 gene sequencing and deletion/duplication analyses at no additional cost. Additionally, Ambry will contact clinicians to discuss any clinically-significant BRCA1/2 incidental findings on all in-house samples.

Ambry utilizes next generation sequencing to offer a genetic testing panel for hereditary cancers (cancer of the breast, colon, ovary, uterus and/or other), including BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genes on this panel include APC, ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, BMPR1A, CDH1, CHEK2,  EPCAM, MLH1, MRE11A, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, SMAD4, STK11, and TP53. Full gene sequencing and analysis of all coding domains plus at least 5 bases into the 5’ and 3’ ends of all the introns and untranslated regions (5’UTR and 3’UTR) is performed for 23 of the 24 genes (excluding EPCAM). Gross deletion/duplication analysis is performed for all 24 genes. Specific-site analysis is available for individual gene mutations known to be in the family.

  • Cancer Test Requisition & Pre-Verification Form [1]
  • Consent Form [2]

 

Disease Name 
Cancer, Breast, Colon, Uterine, Ovarian, Other
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes
Disease Information 

Breast cancer is a disease in which cells in the breast become abnormal and multiply to form a malignant tumor.  Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in developed countries, affecting about 1 in 8 (~12.29%) women in her lifetime.1 The NCI estimates that  approximately 227,000 new cases of female breast cancer and 2,200 new cases of male breast will be diagnosed in the U.S. in 2012.2

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer among women, affecting approximately 1 in 71 (1.4%) women in her lifetime.1 The NCI estimates that approximately 22,280 new cases of ovarian cancer will be diagnosed and 15,500 ovarian cancer deaths will occur in the U.S. in 2012.2  It is leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy, characterized by advanced presentation with regional dissemination in the peritoneal cavity. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common form and arises as a result of genetic alterations sustained by the ovarian surface epithelium. 

Hereditary breast cancers tend to occur earlier in life than non-inherited sporadic cases and are more likely to involve both breasts. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers caused by mutations in the highly penetrant genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, appear to be responsible for about 10-18% of total breast cancers and ovarian cancers.3,8,14 However, additional genes have been discovered that contribute to the incidence of breast and ovarian cancers as well.3-6,8,14

Colorectal (CRC) cancer affects about 1 in 20 (5.1%)  of men and women in their lifetime.1 The NCI estimates that approximately 103,170 (colon) and 40,290 (rectal) new cases will be diagnosed and 51,690 CRC deaths will occur in the U.S. in 2012.2  CRC is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States when men and women are considered separately, and the 2nd leading cause of cancer related deaths when combined.2 The majority of CRCs are sporadic, but approximately 25% are familial, a subset of which showing strong genetic etiology. 

Uterine cancer affects about 1 in 38 (2.61%)  women in her lifetime.1 The NCI estimates that approximately 47,130 new cases of uterine cancer will be diagnosed and 8,010 uterine cancer deaths will occur in the U.S. in 2012.2  Increased risk for uterine cancer has been identified in a number of hereditary cancer syndromes, including Lynch syndrome and Cowden syndrome.

CancerNext is a next-gen cancer panel that simultaneously analyzes selected genes associated with an increased risk for a wide range of cancers. While mutations in each gene on this panel may be individually rare, they collectively account for a significant amount of hereditary cancer susceptibility. This panel may be appropriate in a number of scenarios, particularly if the family history shares features of several different hereditary cancer syndromes.

Figure Legend: If there are multiple cancers in the family that could fit into different hereditary cancer syndromes, such as in the pedigree example above, consider CancerNext,

CancerNext Panel Genes

APC  germline mutation are well established as the primary cause of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and attentuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP).  FAP is an autosomal dominant colon cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by hundreds to thousands of adenomatous polyps in the internal lining of the colon and the rectum. It affects 1/8,000 to 1/10,000 individuals and accounts for about 1% of all colorectal cancers.7 In individuals affected with classic FAP, colonic polyps generally begin developing at an average age of 16 years.8 Colon cancer is inevitable without colectomy, and the mean age of colon cancer diagnosis in untreated individuals is age 35-40 years.9 Variants of FAP are Gardner syndrome, Turcot syndrome, and attenuated FAP (AFAP).7 

ATM is a gene classically associated with an autosomal recessive condition called ataxia-telangiectasia (AT). AT is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia with onset between ages one and four, telangiectases of the conjunctivae, oculomotor apraxia, immune defects, and a predisposition to malignancy, particularly leukemia and lymphoma. Heterozygous carrier females also have an estimated 2-4 fold increased risk for breast cancer.10

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes that have an essential role in both DNA repair and cell cycle control systems. BRCA1/2 germline mutations are implicated in majority of hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome cases. HBOC displays an autosomal dominant phenotype with incomplete penetrance. Frequent clinical findings include: increased risk for early-onset breast cancer (35-40 years of age) and increased risk for ovarian/fallopian tube, pancreatic, stomach and/or prostate cancers. Female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have between a 25-80% lifetime risk to develop breast cancer and between a 10-40% lifetime risk to develop ovarian cancer. Men and women have between 1.3-7% lifetime risk for pancreatic cancer; and men have a 30-39% lifetime risk for prostate cancer as well as a 5-10% lifetime risk for male breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer risks are further modified by family history, reproductive choices, lifestyle and environmental factors and other genetic factors.

BARD1, BRIP1, MRE11A, NBN, RAD50, and RAD51C  are genes involved in the Fanconi anemia (FA)–BRCA pathway, which is critical for DNA repair by homologous recombination and interact in vivo with BRCA1 or BRCA2.3,11-13 Mutations in these genes are estimated to confer up to a 4 fold increase in breast cancer risk, and mutations in each have been reported in at least 1 identified case of ovarian cancer to date.14

BMPR1A and SMAD4 are genes implicated in juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), together accounting for 45-60% of JPS. JPS is an autosomal dominant disorder that predisposes to development of polyps in the gastrointestinal tract.15  Malignant transformation can occur with risk of gastrointestinal cancer ranging from 9% to 50%. Juvenile polyposis of infancy involves the entire digestive tract and has the poorest prognosis.16 Most other patients develop symptoms by age 20 though some are not diagnosed until the third decade of life. Common symptoms include gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Early detection of JPS allows for better treatment of polyps and surveillance of at-risk individuals. SMAD4 mutations may cause a combined syndrome of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) with JPS as reported in 22% of JPS patients with SMAD4 mutations.17

CHEK2 is a gene that receives signals from damaged DNA, transmitted to CHEK2 via ATM.  Known substrates of CHEK2 include BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53, which have all been implicated in cellular processes responsible for the maintenance of genomic stability. Multiple studies indicate that mutations in the CHEK2 gene confer an increased risk of developing many types of cancer including breast, prostate, colon, thyroid, and kidney. Mutations are more likely to be found among women with bilateral versus those with unilateral breast cancers. A female carrier of a CHEK2 mutation has approximately a 2 fold increase in lifetime breast cancer risk and has a 1% risk per year of developing a second breast primary cancer. Ovarian cancer risk has also been suggested.14,18-21

CDH1 germline mutations have been associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) and lobular breast cancer in women. In one published study, the estimated cumulative risk of gastric cancer for CDH1 mutation carriers by age 80 years is 67% for men and 83% for women.22 HDGC patients typically present with diffuse-type gastric cancer with signet ring cells diffusely infiltrating the wall of the stomach and, at late stage, linitis plastica. An elevated risk of lobular breast cancer is also associated with HDGC,23 with an estimated lifetime breast cancer risk of 39-52%.

EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 are mismatch repair genes that have been associated with Lynch syndrome (HNPCC).  Lynch syndrome is estimated to cause 2-5% of all colon cancer. Lynch syndrome is associated with a significantly increased risk for colon cancer (60-80% lifetime risk), uterine/endometrial cancer (20-60% lifetime risk in women), stomach cancer (11-19% lifetime risk), and ovarian cancer (4-13% lifetime risk in women). Risk for cancer of the small intestine, hepatobiliary tract, upper urinary tract and brain are also elevated.24-26

MUTYH germline mutations are classically associated with an autosomal recessive form of hereditary polyposis. Clinical studies have shown that MUTYH mutations were detected in 33% and 57% of patients with clinical familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)and attentuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP), respectively, who are negative for mutations in the APC gene.27 Two common mutations, p.Y179C and p.G396D (originally designated as Y165C and G382D), have been reported as homozygous or compound heterozygous in about 70%-86% of MAP patients.28,29 Heterozygous mutations have also been associated with a 1.9 fold increased risk for breast cancer.30 In this series, characteristics of tumors and at of diagnosis in carriers with MUTYH variants were similar to those without MUTYH variants.27-30

PALB2 germline mutations have been associated with increased risk for pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and fanconi-anemia complementation group N (FA-N). Familial pancreatic and/or breast cancer due to PALB2 mutations is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, while FA-N is an autosomal recessive condition.  Females with a PALB2 mutation have a 2 to 4 fold increase in risk for breast cancer,31-33 and a recent report has suggested an increased risk for ovarian cancer as well.14

PTEN is a gene that has been associated with Cowden syndrome, PTEN Hammartoma Tumor syndrome (PHTS), Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome, Proteus syndrome and autism spectrum disorder. Cowden Syndrome is a multiple hamartoma syndrome with a high risk of developing tumors of the thyroid, breast, and endomentrium. Mucocutaneous lesions, thyroid abnormalities, fibrocystic disease, multiple uterine leiomyoma, and macrocephaly can also be seen. Affected individuals have a lifetime risk of up to 50% for breast cancer, 10% for thyroid cancer, and 5-10% for endometrial cancer. Over 90% of individuals with CS will express some clinical manifestation by their 20’s.34,35

STK11 germline mutations have been associated with Peutz-Jegher syndrome (PJS), an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the development of gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps and melanin hyperpigmentation of the skin and mucous membranes. Overall, individuals affected with PJS have a 57-81% risk of developing cancer by age of 70, with gastrointestinal/colon and breast cancers being the most common.36,37

TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene that causes Li-Fraumeni and Li-Fraumeni like syndrome, which can affect adults and children. Individuals with TP53 mutations have a 50% risk of developing any of the associated cancers by age 30 and a lifetime risk up to 90%, including sarcomas, breast cancer, brain tumors (including astrocytomas, glioblastomas, medulloblastomas and choroid plexus carcinomas), and adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Studies have shown that a small percentage of women who are BRCA1 and BRCA2 negative are identified to have mutations in TP53.21,38,39

 

Testing Benefits & Indication 

Indications for Testing
This panel may be appropriate in the following situations, combined with common red flags for hereditary cancer:

  • The family history is clearly suggestive of hereditary cancer, but all the genetic testing ordered thus far has been normal
  • There are several different types of cancers in the family history that do not seem to fit a particular hereditary cancer syndrome
  • The family history shares features of several different hereditary cancer syndromes

Common Red Flags for Hereditary Cancer

  • Cancer diagnosed at a younger age than expected for the general population (</= 50 for most cancers)
  • Cancer diagnosed across generations and in multiple generations within a family
  • Individual with multiple  primary cancers (either in paired organs or in different organs)
  • A pattern of cancer in the family that is typical of a known cancer predisposition syndrome (for example colon and uterine cancer in Lynch syndrome or breast and pancreatic cancer with PALB2-related cancer)
     
Benefits of Testing
Knowing your patient has a genetic susceptibility for certain cancers can help with medical management. For example, this information can:
 
  • Modify breast cancer surveillance options and age of initial screening
  • Suggest specific risk-reduction measures (e.g. Considering prophylactic oopherectomy, or removal of the ovaries, after childbearing is complete for women with increased risk for breast/ ovarian cancer)
  • Clarify and stratify familial cancer risks, based on gene-specific cancer associations, such as risk for uterine, colon and ovarian cancer with mutations MLH1.
  • Offer treatment guidance (e.g. Avoidance of radiation-based treatment methods for individuals with a TP53 mutation)
  • Identify other at-risk family members
  • Provide guidance with new gene-specific treatment options and risk reduction measures as they emerge

Selected Medical Management Guidelines* (based on NCCN guidelines).40

Breast Cancer (recommended for women with >/=20-25% lifetime risk)

  • Breast self-exam training and education stated at age 18y
  • Clinical breast exam every 6-12 months, starting at age 25 or 5-10 years before the earliest known breast cancer in the family
  • Annual mammography and breast MRI screening starting at age 30-35 or 5-10 years before the earliest known breast cancer diagnosis in the family

Ovarian Cancer

  • Consideration of risk-reducing  oophorectomy on a case-by-case basis, after childbearing is complete
  • Consideration of trans-vaginal ultrasound and CA-125 analysis every 6 months starting at age 35 or 5-10 years before the earliest ovarian cancer diagnosis in the family

Uterine Cancer

  • Patient education and prompt response to symptoms
  • Participation in clinical trials to determine effectiveness and necessity of screening
  • Hysterectomy on a case-by-case basis

Colon Cancer

  • Colonoscopy at frequent intervals and at a younger age.  Actual frequency of screening and age to initiate screening will depend on genetic predisposition and family history.
  • Routine upper endoscopy may be recommended depending on genetic predisposition and family history.

Other Cancer

  • Screening for other types of cancer may be recommended based on test results.
  • Specific treatments may be pursued or avoided based on underlying genetic predisposition.

*Medical management recommendations will depend on which gene is found to be mutated.  Additional information regarding cancer risks and medical management options can be found in cited literature.   

Test Description 

The CancerNext Panel targets detection of mutations in 23 of the 24 genes (APC, ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, BMPR1A, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MRE11A, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, SMAD4. STK11, and TP53) by next-generation sequencing or Sanger sequencing of all coding domains plus at least 5 bases into the 5’ and 3’ ends of all the introns and untranslated regions (5’UTR and 3’UTR).  Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (gDNA) is isolated from the patient’s specimen using a standardized kit and quantified by agarose gel electrophoresis.  Sequence enrichment is carried out by incorporating the gDNA into microdroplets along with primer pairs designed to the target hereditary cancer gene coding exons followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing.  A secondary sequencing method is performed for any regions with insufficient read depth coverage for reliable heterozygous variant detection. Variant calls other than polymorphisms are verified by sequencing in sense and antisense directions.  Gene copy number analysis identifies gross deletions or duplications in all 24 genes (APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BMPR1A, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, SMAD4, STK11, and TP53). If a deletion is detected in exons 13, 14, or 15 of PMS2, double stranded sequencing of the appropriate exon(s) of the pseudogene PMS2CL will be performed to determine if the deletion is located in the PMS2 gene or pseudogene. 

Mutation Detection Rate 

Analytical sensitivity for 24 genes analyzed via next-gen sequencing is 96-99% of described mutations.

Specimen Requirements 

Blood: Collect 6-10cc blood in purple top EDTA tube (preferred) or yellow top citric acetate tube.

Storage: 2-8°C. Do not freeze.
Shipment: Room temperature for two-day delivery.
For transfusion patients: Wait at least two weeks after a packed cell or platelet transfusion and at least four weeks after a whole blood transfusion prior to blood draw

DNA: Collect 20μg of of DNA in TE (10mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 1mM EDTA); preferred at 200 ng/μl.
Quality: Please provide DNA OD 260:280 ratio (preferred 1.7-1.9) and send agarose picture with high molecular weight genomic DNA, if available.
Storage: -20°C.
Shipment: Shipment frozen on dry ice is preferred, or ship on ice.

Saliva: Collect 2ml in Oragene Self Collection container
Storage: At room temperature in sterile bag.
Shipment: Ship room temperature for two-day deliver

Billing Codes 
Test Code Technique
8824 CancerNext Gene Analysis

 

Updated CPT Codes for 2013 [3]
Turnaround Time 
Technique Weeks
CancerNext Gene Analysis 12 - 16

 

Specialty 
Cancer [4]
Genes 
ATM [5]
BARD1 [6]
BRIP1 [7]
MRE11A [8]
NBN [9]
RAD50 [10]
RAD51C [11]
PALB2 [12]
CDH1 [13]
CHEK2 [14]
MUTYH [15]
PTEN [16]
STK11 [17]
TP53 [18]
EPCAM [19]
MLH1 [20]
MSH2 [21]
MSH6 [22]
PMS2 [23]
APC [24]
BMPR1A [25]
SMAD4 [26]
BRCA1 [27]
BRCA2 [28]
Techniques 
Deletion/Duplication Analysis [29]
Next-Generation (Next-Gen) Sequencing [30]
Specific Mutation Analysis [31]
References 

1. http://seer.cancer.gov [32]

2. http://www.cancer.gov [33]

3. Pennington & Swisher. Hereditary ovarian cancer: beyond the usual suspects. Gyn Onc. 2012;124:347-353. [PMID: 22264603] [34]

4. van der Groep & van del Wall. Pathology of hereditary breast cancer. Cell Oncol.  2011;34:71-88. [PMID: 21336636] [35]

5. Walsh et al. Ten genes for inherited breast cancer. Cancer Cell.  2007:11;103-105. [PMID: 17292821] [36]

6. Meindl et al. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes, new treatments, new concepts. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(19):323-330. [PMID: 21637635] [37]

7.  Lipton L et al. The genetics of FAP and FAP-like syndromes. Fam Cancer. 2006; 5(3):221-226. [PMID: 16998667] [38]

8.  Petersen GM et al. Screening guidelines and premorbid diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis using linkage. Gastroenterology. 1991; 100(6):1658-1664. [PMID: 1673441] [39]

9.  Pedace L et al., Identification of a novel duplication in the APC gene using multiple ligation probe amplification in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008; 182(2):130-135. [PMID: 18406876] [40]

10. Renwick et al.,  ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nature Genetics. 2006;38(8):873-875. [PMID: 16832357] [41]

11. Walsh et al., Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. PNAS. 2010;107(28):12629-12633. [PMID:  [42]16474176] [43]

13. Ghimenti et al., Germline mutations of the BRCA1-associated ring domain (BARD1) gene in breast and breast/ovarian families negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations. Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer. 2002;33:235-242. [PMID: 11807980] [44]

14. Walsh et al., Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencing. PNAS. 2011:108(44);10832-18037. [PMID: 22006311] [45]

15. Van Hattem WA et al., Large genomic deletions of SMAD4, BMPR1A and PTEN in juvenile polyposis. Gut. 2008;57:623-627. [PMID: 18178612] [46]

16. Chow E & Macrae F. J Gastroenterol Hepatol., A review of juvenile polyposis syndrome. 2005;20:1634-1640. [PMID: 16246179] [47]

17. Gallione CJ et al., A combined syndrome of juvenile polyposis and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia associated with mutations in MADH4 (SMAD4). Lancet. 2004;363:852-859 [PMID: 15031030] [48]

18. Bahassi, EM. et al., The checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2 regulate the functional associations between hBRCA2 and Rad51 in response to DNA damage. Oncogene. 2008; 27, 3977–3985. [PMID: 18317453] [49]

19. Orloff and Eng et al., Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in the PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome. Oncogene. 2008; 27, 5387-5397. [PMID: 18794875] [50]

20. Cybulski et al., CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:1131–1135. [PMID: 15492928]  [51]

21. Walsh et al., Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2006;295(12):1379-1388. [PMID: 16551709] [52]

22. Narod SA., Testing for CHEK2 in the cancer genetics clinic: ready for prime time? Clin Genet. 2010;78:1-7. [PMID: 20597917] [53]

23. Pharoah PD et al., Incidence of gastric cancer and breast cancer in CDH1 (E-cadherin) mutation carriers from hereditary diffuse gastric cancer families. Gastro. 2001;121:1348-1353. [PMID: 20597917] [54]

24. Guilford P et al., Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: translation of CDH1 germline mutations into clinical practice. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:1-10 [PMID: 20373070] [55]

25. Abdel-Rahman WM et al., The genetics of HNPCC: application to diagnosis and screening. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006;53:208-220. [PMID: 16434208] [56]

26. Hedge MR & Roa BB. Genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009;10.21(61):1-28. [PMID: 19360696]  [57]

27. Filipe B et al., APC or MUTYH mutations account for the majority of clinically well-characterized families with FAP and AFAP phenotype and patients with more than 30 adenomas. Clin Genet. 2009;76:242-255. [PMID: 19793053] [58]

28. Sampson JR & Jones N., MUTYH-associated polyposis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(2):209-18. [PMID: 19414147] [59]

29. Barnetson RA et al., Germline mutation prevalence in the base excision repair gene, MYH, in patients with endometrial cancer. Clin Genet. 2007; 72:551-555. [PMID: 17956577] [60]

30. Rennert et al. MutYH mutation carriers have increased breast cancer risk. Cancer.  2012; 118(8):1989-93. [PMID: 21952991] [61]

31. Jones, S. et al., Exomic sequencing identifies PALB2 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene. Science. 2009;324(5924): p. 217. [PMID: 19264984] [62]

32. Slater, E.P. et al., PALB2 mutations in European familial pancreatic cancer families. Clin Genet. 2010;78(5): p. 490-4. [PMID: 20412113] [63]

33. Casadei S et al. Cancer Res, 2011;71(6):2222-2229. [PMID: 21285249] [64]

34. Eng C. J Med Genet. Will the real Cowden syndrome please stand up: revised diagnostic criteria. 2000;37:828-830. [PMID: 11073535] [65]

35. Starink TM et al., The Cowden syndrome: a clinical and genetic study in 21 patients. Clin Genet. 1986;29:222–233. [PMID: 3698331] [66]

36. Lim W et al., Relative frequency and morphology of cancers in STK11 mutation carriers. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1788-1794. [PMID: 15188174] [67]

37. Hearle et al., Frequency and spectrum of cancers in the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3209-3215. [PMID: 16707622] [68]

38. Birch JM et al., Prevalence and diversity of constitutional mutations in the p53 gene among 21 Li-Fraumeni families. Cancer Research. 1994;54: 1298-1304. [PMID: 8118819] [69]

39. Olivier M et al., Li-Fraumeni and related syndromes: correlation between tumor type, family structure, and TP53 genotype. Cancer Research. 2003;63: 6643-6650. [PMID: 14583457] [70]

40. Adapted from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp [71]. Accessed Feb 28, 2012.   

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy & Legal
  • Contact

Copyright © Ambry Genetics Corp.  All rights reserved.

Ambry Genetics | 15 Argonaut, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656  |  Toll Free (866) 262-7943  |  Phone (949) 900-5500  |  Fax (949) 900-5501

llactid=19698

Source URL: http://ambrygen.com/tests/cancernext

Links:
[1] http://ambrygen.com/sites/default/files/pdfs/forms/most_updated/cancer/CancerTestReqForm%28BRCA%296-17.pdf
[2] http://ambrygen.com/sites/default/files/pdfs/cancer%20forms/CancerNGSConsentForm.pdf
[3] http://ambrygen.com/cpt-codes-2013
[4] http://ambrygen.com/specialties/cancer
[5] http://ambrygen.com/genes/atm
[6] http://ambrygen.com/genes/bard1
[7] http://ambrygen.com/genes/brip1
[8] http://ambrygen.com/genes/mre11a
[9] http://ambrygen.com/genes/nbn
[10] http://ambrygen.com/genes/rad50
[11] http://ambrygen.com/genes/rad51c
[12] http://ambrygen.com/genes/palb2
[13] http://ambrygen.com/genes/cdh1
[14] http://ambrygen.com/genes/chek2
[15] http://ambrygen.com/genes/mutyh
[16] http://ambrygen.com/genes/pten
[17] http://ambrygen.com/genes/stk11
[18] http://ambrygen.com/genes/tp53
[19] http://ambrygen.com/genes/epcam
[20] http://ambrygen.com/genes/mlh1
[21] http://ambrygen.com/genes/msh2
[22] http://ambrygen.com/genes/msh6
[23] http://ambrygen.com/genes/pms2
[24] http://ambrygen.com/genes/apc
[25] http://ambrygen.com/genes/bmpr1a
[26] http://ambrygen.com/genes/smad4
[27] http://ambrygen.com/genes/brca1
[28] http://ambrygen.com/genes/brca2
[29] http://ambrygen.com/techniques/deletionduplication-analysis
[30] http://ambrygen.com/techniques/next-generation-next-gen-sequencing
[31] http://ambrygen.com/techniques/specific-mutation-analysis
[32] http://seer.cancer.gov/
[33] http://www.cancer.gov/
[34] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Pennington%20%26%20Swisher.%20Gyn%20Onc.%202012%3B124%3A347-353
[35] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21336636
[36] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17292821
[37] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Meindl%20et%20al.%20Dtsch%20Arztebl%20Int.%202011%3B108(19)%3A323-330.
[38] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Lipton%20L%20et%20al.%20Fam%20Cancer.%202006%3B%205(3)%3A221-226.
[39] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=1673441
[40] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Pedace%20L%20et%20al.%20Cancer%20Genet%20Cytogenet.%202008%3B%20182(2)%3A130-135.
[41] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Renwick%20et%20al%20Nature%20Genetics.%202006%3B38(8)%3A873-875.%20
[42] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=PMID%3A%2016474176
[43] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Walsh%20et%20al.%20PNAS.%202010%3B107(28)%3A12629-12633.
[44] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ghimenti%20et%20al.%20Genes%2C%20Chromosomes%20%26%20Cancer.%202002%3B33%3A235-242.
[45] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22006311
[46] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Van%20Hattem%20WA%20et%20al.%20Gut.%202008%3B57%3A623-627
[47] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Chow%20E%20%26%20Macrae%20F.%20J%20Gastroenterol%20Hepatol.%202005%3B20%3A1634-1640.
[48] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gallione%20CJ%20et%20al.%20Lancet.%202004%3B363%3A852-859
[49] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bahassi%2C%20EM.%20et%20al.%20Oncogene.%202008%3B%2027%2C%203977–3985.
[50] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Orloff%20and%20Eng%20et%20al.%20Oncogene.%202008%3B%2027%2C%205387-5397.
[51] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Cybulski%20et%20al.%20Am%20J%20Hum%20Genet.%202004%3B75%3A1131–1135.
[52] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Walsh%20et%20al%20JAMA.%202006%3B295(12)%3A1379-1388.
[53] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20597917
[54] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Pharoah%20PD%20et%20al.%20Gastro.%202001%3B121%3A1348-1353.
[55] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20373070
[56] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Abdel-Rahman%20WM%20et%20al.%20Crit%20Rev%20Oncol%20Hematol.%202006%3B53%3A208-220
[57] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19360696
[58] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Filipe%20B%20et%20al.%20Clin%20Genet.%202009%3B76%3A242-255.
[59] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Sampson%20JR%20%26%20Jones%20N.%20Best%20Pract%20Res%20Clin%20Gastroenterol.%202009%3B23(2)%3A209-18.
[60] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Barnetson%20RA%20et%20al.%20Clin%20Genet.%202007%3B%2072%3A551-555.
[61] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21952991
[62] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Jones%2C%20S.%2C%20et%20al.%2C%20Exomic%20sequencing%20identifies%20PALB2%20as%20a%20pancreatic%20cancer%20susceptibility%20gene.%20Science.%202009%3B324(5924)%3A%20p.%20217.
[63] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Slater%2C%20E.P.%2C%20et%20al.%2C%20PALB2%20mutations%20in%20European%20familial%20pancreatic%20cancer%20families.%20Clin%20Genet.%202010%3B78(5)%3A%20p.%20490-4.
[64] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Casadei%20S%20et%20al.%20Cancer%20Res%2C%202011%3B71(6)%3A2222-2229.
[65] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Eng%20C.%20J%20Med%20Genet.%202000%3B37%3A828-830.
[66] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Starink%20TM%20et%20al.%20Clin%20Genet.%201986%3B29%3A222–233.
[67] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Lim%20W%20et%20al.%20Gastroenterology.%202004%3B126%3A1788-1794.
[68] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Hearle%20et%20al.%20Clin%20Cancer%20Res.%202006%3B12%3A3209-3215.
[69] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8118819
[70] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Olivier%20M%20et%20al.%20Cancer%20Research.%202003%3B63%3A%206643-6650.
[71] http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp