FOXG1 syndrome: genotype–phenotype association in 83 patients with FOXG1 variants

Specialty Areas:
Date: November 29, 2017
Authors:
Ali Fatemi, Angelika Eger, Carolina Courage, Diana Mitter, Elizabeth Conover, Hans-Martin Büttel, Julie S. Cohen, Katherine L. Helbig, Kim Sarah Plümacher, Marc Kaulisch, Marion Heruth, Martina Baethmann, Milka Pringsheim, Natalie S Hauser, Rami Abou Jamra, Rita Warthemann, Simone Schröder, Theresa A Grebe, Thomas Bast, Wolfram Heinritz
Journal: Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics

PurposeThe study aimed at widening the clinical and genetic spectrum and assessing genotype-phenotype associations in FOXG1 syndrome due to FOXG1 variants.MethodsWe compiled 30 new and 53 reported patients with a heterozygous pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in FOXG1. We grouped patients according to type and location of the variant. Statistical analysis of molecular and clinical data was performed using Fisher’s exact test and a nonparametric multivariate test.ResultsAmong the 30 new patients, we identified 19 novel FOXG1 variants. Among the total group of 83 patients, there were 54 variants: 20 frameshift (37%), 17 missense (31%), 15 nonsense (28%), and 2 in-frame variants (4%). Frameshift and nonsense variants are distributed over all FOXG1 protein domains; missense variants cluster within the conserved forkhead domain. We found a higher phenotypic variability than previously described. Genotype-phenotype association revealed significant differences in psychomotor development and neurological features between FOXG1 genotype groups. More severe phenotypes were associated with truncating FOXG1 variants in the N-terminal domain and the forkhead domain (except conserved site 1) and milder phenotypes with missense variants in the forkhead conserved site 1.ConclusionsThese data may serve for improved interpretation of new FOXG1 sequence variants and well-founded genetic counseling.Genetics in Medicine advance online publication, 29 June 2017;